Xyz v. State Gnct Of Delhi Through Sho Ps Mohan Garden & ANR.

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5302/2023 and CRL.M.A. 20166/2023 XYZ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Bharadwaj, Advocate versus STATE GNCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO PS MOHAN GARDEN & ANR.

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with Ms.Nikita Tiwari, Advocate with SI Rachana and SI Ritu

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 30.07.2024 1.

By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks cancellation of bail granted to respondent No.2 vide order dated 18.01.2023. 2.

The only premise to file the present petition is that the complainant, father of the victim, has alleged that the respondent No.2 indirectly has been threatening the complainant to withdraw the present case. 3.

During the pendency of the present proceedings, the petitioner has handed over 6 complaints which were given on the aforesaid aspect. On notice being issued, a status report has been filed. A copy of the same has been handed over which is taken on record. The relevant extract reads as under:- Sr.

No.

Gist of complaint and Action taken 1.

81760122101743 Date 17/09/2021 Complaint/ICMS No.

Enquiry Officer Current Status HC Rattan Lal Meena alleged that on 16th Nov.

a The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

unknown car driver hit his standing scooty while he purchasing some goods near Dwarka Mor Metro Station 27/08/2021 an unknown erickshaw driver hit his scooty from back while he was standing on red light.

Action Taken:- As per the contents of the complaint no cognizable offence is made concerned EO filed the complaint.

2.

50000046762302 Date 14/02/2023 SI Ranjana alleged that some police officials visited his house and asking about the CCTV as one person's bag was snatched by some unknown vehicle.

He has fear that why they asked about CCTV camera.

Action Taken :- As The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

per the enquiry report the police officials were went there following a natural process of investigation search of CCTV Camera in any snatching case. As cognizable offence was made complaint filed.

3.

81760122200474 Date 13/04/2022 SI Ritu Dangi alleged that 06.04.2022 a case FIR No. 236/2022 registered against his son Anurag Gautam and on the same day when he was present in Police Station, an unknown person ask him to settle the case.

provided a vehicle number of suspicious Scorpio Car one suspicious mobile number also.

Action Taken :- Details of Scorpio The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Car were taken and it was found that it was victim's uncle Car (victim of case FIR No.

236/2022) further connection found between the suspicious mobile number (It Victim's uncle's No.) and mobile number of accused Chaitanya Yadav.

Therefore complaint was filed as no offence was made out.

4.

81760122301865 Date 17/10/2023 HD Hetram In the complaint, complainant alleged that 12/10/2023 in the morning at 04'O Clock, 3 unknown persons came on scooty and lighten the matchstick for cigarette and then burnt his scooty cover.

Action Taken :

After receiving the complaint, CCTV footage analysed and on analysis it The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

found that one of the boy lightened his cigarette and put the same burning matchstick scooty cover and then another boy come and put the fire.

Further scooty number was not seen property in CCTV footage.

As per the enquiry report, there was damage to scooty and cover of scooty was also not burnt.

As cognizable offence made complaint filed.

5.

801012347169 Date 16.10.2023 HC Sunil Same complaint as mentioned serial no. 04 6.

50000046762314 HC Sunil Same complaint as mentioned serial no. 04 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that insofar as complaint No.3 is concerned, in the chargesheet filed, the concerned I.O. has also filed CDRs of the complainant and a reading of that would show that the complainant in that case and respondent No.2 were in touch with each other. A copy of complaint No.3 dated 13.04.2022 has been placed on record. A The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

reading of the same would show that the same was made after the FIR was already registered. The visit by the police officials was in consequence of the complaint. The victim in the present case has already been examined and discharged.

5.

In view of the Status Report placed on record, I find no merit in the petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed alongwith the pending application.

6.

Needless to state that in case the complainant/victim makes any other complaint, the same would be examined on its own merits. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J JULY 30, 2024 na The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.