Akram v. State

$~40 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 333/2018 AKRAM ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi S.Kansal, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC with SI Mahesh.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 01.02.2018 1.

The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of three months. Status report filed. It is taken on record. Address of the petitioner has been confirmed by the State.

2.

Nominal Roll dated 22.01.2018 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Sections 302/397/394/34 IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for life with total fine `3,000/-. Crl.A.452/2013 was dismissed by this Court on 26.09.2017. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone seven years, nine months and one day incarceration besides remission for two years, one month and eight days as on 22.01.2018. It further reveals that he is not

involved in any other criminal case and is not a previous convict. His overall jail conduct is satisfactory. He has not availed any parole till date.

3.

In the interest of justice and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted three weeks parole from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `30,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent.

4.

Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. S.P.GARG, J FEBRUARY 01, 2018 / tr