Nasir Ahmad v. Union Of India And ORS

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 21.04.2023 + W.P.(C) 10585/2021 NASIR AHMAD ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Mananyay Mishra & Mr.Bhaskar Pandey, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Ms.Anju Gupta & Mr.Roshan Lal Goel, Advs. for UOI.

Sh.Hemendra Singh, Deputy Commandant (Law) BSF.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) 1.

Vide the present petition, petitioner prays as under: a. To treat the petitioners as the members of the Old Pension Scheme, and extend the pension benefits as per the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972;

b. To grant the benefits of the Old pension Scheme, in accordance with Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972; c. To declare that the New Pension Scheme notification dated 22.12.2003 is discriminatory.

2.

The issue raised in the present petition has already been decided by this Court in W.P.(C) No.12712/2021 titled as "Pawan Kumar & Ors. vs. W.P.(C) 10585/2021 Page 1 of 2 By:ALKA BOBAL 11:10

Union of India & Ors." and batch decided on 11.01.2023, therefore, no further order is required to be passed in the present petition. 3.

In view of above, petition is disposed of.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA) JUDGE APRIL 21, 2023/ab W.P.(C) 10585/2021 Page 2 of 2 By:ALKA BOBAL 11:10