← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/10596/2021

Resident Welfare Association Pocket- K And v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & ORS.

2026-02-05Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit Bansal3 pages

$~13, 14, 19 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

13.

+ W.P.(C) 10596/2021, CM APPL. 32687/2021 & CM APPL. 11485/2025 RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATION POCKET- K AND .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Deepansh Mathpal, Advocate.

versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Tushar Sannu, Ms. Pulak Gupta and Mr. Umesh, Advocates for MCD.

Mr.

Rakesh Mittal, Mr.

Ajay Harshana and Ms. Yamini Mittal, Advocates for MCD.

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sharda, Mr. Rajiv Dalal and Ms. Shreshtha Kaushik, Advocates for R-3 with Mr. Nishant Dwivedi, A.R. of R-3.

14.

+ W.P.(C) 11372/2021, CM APPL. 35024/2021 & CM APPL. 11478/2025 RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATION C-II VASANTKUNJ NEW DELHI .....Petitioner Through:

None.

versus GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Tushar Sannu, Ms. Pulak Gupta and Mr. Umesh, Advocates for MCD.

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sharda, Mr. Rajiv Dalal and Ms. Shreshtha Kaushik, The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Advocates for R-3 with Mr. Nishant Dwivedi, A.R. of R-3 19.

+ W.P.(C) 9717/2021, CM APPL. 29989/2021 & CM APPL. 20108/2025 RAHUL HITESHI .....Petitioner Through:

None.

versus COMMISSIONER SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Ms. Arti Bansal, ASC for MCD with Ms. Shruti Goel, Advocate.

Mr.

Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, Advocate for UoI.

ASI Chanderhas, P.S.: Tilak Nagar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

% 05.02.2026 W.P.(C) 10596/2021, W.P.(C) 11372/2021 and W.P.(C) 9717/2021 1.

CM APPL.

11485/2025 in W.P.(C) 10596/2021, CM APPL.

11478/2025 in W.P.(C) 11372/2021 and CM APPL. 20108/2025 in W.P.(C) 9717/2021 have been filed on behalf of respondent no.3 stating that a decision has been taken by respondent no.3/applicant to not operate its tower from the site that has been mentioned in the said writ petitions. It is further stated that the tower has been dismantled and removed. 2.

Counsel appears on behalf of the petitioner in W.P.(C) 10596/2021 and submits that he has no objection to the petition being disposed of light of the above.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

3.

None appear on behalf of the petitioners in W.P.(C) 11372/2021 and W.P.(C) 9717/2021.

4.

Accordingly, the applications are allowed and the captioned writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous.

AMIT BANSAL, J FEBRUARY 5, 2026 Vivek/- The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.