← Library
High Court of DelhiITA/420/2023

Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2 v. L.G. Electronics Inc. Korea

2023-08-02Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher,Mr. Girish Kathpalia3 pages

$~349 & 350 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:02.08.2023 + ITA 420/2023 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2 ..... Appellant Through:

Mr Sanjay Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Easha Kadian and Ms Hemlata Rawat, Advocates.

versus L.G. ELECTRONICS INC. KOREA ..... Respondent Through:

Mr Rohan Khare, Adv.

+ ITA 421/2023 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2 ..... Appellant Through:

Mr Sanjay Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Easha Kadian and Ms Hemlata Rawat, Advocates.

versus L.G. ELECTRONICS INC. KOREA ..... Respondent Through:

Mr Rohan Khare, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):

CM No.39039/2023 in ITA No. 420/2023 CM No.39067/2023 in ITA No. 421/2023 1.

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

CM No.39040/2023 in ITA No.420/2023 & CM No. 39068/2023 in ITA

No. 421/2023 [Applications filed on behalf of the appellant/revenue seeking condonation of delay of 60 days in re filing the appeals] 2.

These are the applications moved on behalf of the appellant/revenue, seeking condonation of delay in re-filing the appeals. 2.1 It is the appellant/revenue's contention that there is a delay of 60 days in re-filing, qua the above-captioned appeals. 3.

Mr Rohan Khare, learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the respondent/assessee, says that he has no objection if the court were to condone the delay in re-filing.

4.

It is ordered accordingly.

5.

The above-captioned applications are disposed of. 6.

These appeals concern Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16 [ITA 420/2021] and AY 2016-17 [ITA 421/2023].

7.

Via these appeals, the appellant/revenue seeks to assail the order dated 31.10.2022, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, "Tribunal"] in MA Nos. 276/Del/2022, SA No.128/Del/2022 & MA No. 277/Del/2022, SA No.129/Del/2022.

8.

It is correctly pointed out by the counsel for the parties that in ITA No. 338/2023, which was preferred by the appellant/revenue in the respondent/assessee's case concerning AY 2017-18, this Court had closed the appeal, and granted liberty to the appellant/revenue to file a writ petition, in view of the judgment of the Full Bench of this Court dated 06.08.2010, passed in a bunch of appeals, including ITA 724/2010, titled Lachman Dass Bhatia Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax.

9.

It is ordered accordingly, in the above-captioned appeals as well. 10.

The above-captioned appeals are closed, with liberty to the appellant/revenue to prefer a writ petition.

11.

RAJIV SHAKDHER JUDGE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGE AUGUST 2, 2023/RY Click here to check corrigendum, if any