Vinod Gupta v. State

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2571/2023 VINOD GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Ashneet Singh, APP for the State.

Insp. Niraj K., PS Sarita Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

O R D E R

% 08.01.2024 1.

The present application under Section 439 of the CrPC seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 383/2015, under Section 302 of the IPC, registered at P.S. Sarita Vihar, Delhi.

2.

Learned APP for the State, on instructions of the Investigating Officer, submits that the out of 24 witnesses cited by the prosecution, 19 have already been examined and only 5 witnesses who are formal in nature remains to be examined before the learned Trial Court. 3.

In view of the above, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the present application and prays for directions that the trial be completed in a time-bound manner. 4.

Leave granted.

5.

The present application is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

6.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 16:01:08

7.

The concerned learned Trial Court is directed to complete the trial in the aforesaid FIR within a period of 3 months, without giving any undue adjournment to either of the parties.

8.

Copy of the order be sent to the concerned learned Trial Court, for necessary information and compliance.

AMIT SHARMA, J JANUARY 08, 2024/sn The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 16:01:08