← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./3508/2019

Sumit Anand & ANR. v. State & ANR.

2019-07-22Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Chander Shekhar2 pages

$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3508/2019 SUMIT ANAND & ANR.

..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Rajesh Bagga, Advocate versus STATE & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Raghuvinder Vema, APP with SI Sandeep Maan, PS:Ambedkar Nagar, Delhi Mr. Ishrar Siddiqui & Mr.

Shaurav Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R D E R

% 22.07.2019 CRL.M.A.31609/2019 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 3508/2019 1.

The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.123/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC'), registered at P.S.: Ambedkar Nagar, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom.

2.

The petitioners and respondent No.2 as well as their respective counsel submitted that the parties have settled their disputes on their own free will, without any force or coercion

before the Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, Delhi on 21.2.2018. It is also submitted that the marriage between the petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 has been dissolved by mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 vide a decree of divorce dated 18.12.2018.

3.

Respondent No.2, who is present in Court with her mother, has reiterated the aforesaid facts and submitted that since the matter has been settled and nothing is due and payable to her from the petitioners, she has no objection to the petition being allowed and the FIR being quashed.

4.

The Investigating Officer ('IO'), who is present in Court, has identified the petitioners as well as respondent No.2 and has also verified the settlement arrived at between the parties. 5.

In view of the aforesaid circumstances, the settlement arrived at between the parties and the dissolution of marriage, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the parties entangled in the criminal proceedings. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 123/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at P.S.: Ambedkar Nagar, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

6.

Petition is disposed of in above terms.

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J JULY 22, 2019/tp