Shabnam v. Municipal Corporation Of Delhi And ANR.

$~67 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 6456/2025 & CM APPL.

29394/2025, CM APPL.

29395/2025 SHABNAM .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Satya Bhushan, Advocate M:9810631754 versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Vikas Chopra, SC with Mr.

Neeraj Kumar and Ms.

Khushi, Advocates Mr. Shoaib Akhtar and Mr. Virender, Advocates for R-2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

O R D E R

% 15.05.2025 1.

The present writ petition has been filed for directing the respondent no.1/Municipal Corporation of Delhi ("MCD"), to take action against illegal unauthorized construction being raised by respondent no.2 at property, i.e., property/Plot No.T-146/6/1, area measuring 300 sq. yds., Khasra No.68, situated at Village Kilokari, Chowk Hari Nagar, Ashram, Jagannath Market, Mathura Road, New Delhi.

2.

Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.1/MCD, on advance notice, has handed over a copy of the letter dated 21st April, The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

2025, by which the existing construction in the property at basement, stilt and ground floor to second floor, has been regularized. 3.

The said letter dated 21st April, 2025 reads as under:- 4.

At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there is further unauthorized construction existing on the third floor, as well. 5.

If that be a case, it is directed that against any unauthorized The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

construction, which is existing beyond the construction that has been regularized, due action shall be taken by the respondent no.1/MCD, in accordance with the law.

6.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2, at this stage, submits that respondent no.2 has filed a further application with the respondent no.1/MCD, for additional construction/alteration. The aforesaid statement, is taken note of.

7.

In case, the petitioner is aggrieved by the aforesaid regularization order passed by the respondent no.1/MCD, the petitioner is at liberty to seek her remedy, in accordance with law.

8.

With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition, alongwith the pending applications, is disposed of.

MINI PUSHKARNA, J MAY 15, 2025/akr The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.