Agrante Developers Pvt Ltd & ORS. v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

$~118 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1617/2024 AGRANTE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS.

..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Udai Khanna, Mr.Vandit, Mr.Suraj, Mr.Subham, Advocates with AR of petitioner No.1 and petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 and 6 in person versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

..... Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel with Mr.P.Agarwal, Advocate with SI Pradeep Sharma Counsel for respondent No.2 (appearance not given) with respondent No.2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI % 20.05.2024

O R D E R

1.

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.654/2023 registered under Sections 406/420/34 IPC at P.S. Sarita Vihar on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. 2.

As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioners cheated respondent No.2 on the pretext of selling a flat. 3.

Learned APP for the State submits that in the present case the petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim.

4.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have reached an amicable settlement vide Settlement Agreement dated 10.05.2024. In terms of the settlement, respondent No. 2 is now left with no claim or The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

grievance whatsoever against the petitioners. 5.

The AR of petitioner No.1 and petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 and 6 as well as respondent No.2, who are present in the Court, have been identified by their respective counsels and the Investigating Officer. 6.

Respondent No.2 states that she has entered into the aforesaid Settlement Agreement out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed.

7.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

8.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

9.

In Parbatbhai Aahir and Others v. State of Gujarat and Another reported as (2017) 9 SCC 641, it has been held as under:- "16. The broad principles which emerge from the precedents on the subject, may be summarised in the following propositions:

xxx 16.7. As distinguished from serious offences, there may be criminal cases which have an overwhelming or predominant element of a civil dispute. They stand on a distinct footing in so far as the exercise of the inherent power to quash is concerned; 16.8. Criminal cases involving offences which arise from commercial, financial, mercantile, partnership or similar transactions with an essentially civil flavour may in appropriate situations fall for quashing where parties have settled the dispute;

16.9. In such a case, the High Court may quash the criminal proceeding if in view of the compromise between the disputants, the possibility of a conviction is remote and the continuation of The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

a criminal proceeding would cause oppression and prejudice; and..."

10.

Similarly, in State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and Others reported as (2019) 5 SCC 403, it has been held as under:- "15. Considering the law on the point and the other decisions of this Court on the point, referred to hereinabove, it is observed and held as under:

15.1. That the power conferred Under Section 482 of the Code to quash the criminal proceedings for the non-compoundable offences Under Section 320 of the Code can be exercised having overwhelmingly and predominantly the civil character, particularly those arising out of commercial transactions or arising out of matrimonial relationship or family disputes and when the parties have resolved the entire dispute amongst themselves;"

11.

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to payment of collective cost of Rs.50,000/- to be deposited by the petitioners with the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (A/c No.: 18580110053263, Bank: UCO BANK, Branch: Rouse Avenue, IFSC: UCBA0003364) within a period of four weeks from today. The amount so deposited shall be utilized by the Delhi State Legal Services Authority for providing counselling/psychological support to POCSO victims requiring such assistance.

12.

Proof evidencing receipt of deposit shall be filed with the I.O. In case the receipt of cost is not filed within the stipulated time, the I.O. shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

13.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. 14.

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Member Secretary, Delhi State Legal Services Authority for information. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MAY 20, 2024 na The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.