Tarun @ Khima v. State (Gnct Of Delhi) Through Sho

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1861/2025 TARUN @ KHIMA .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Vineet Jain and Mr. Ashish Mavi, Advs.

versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) THROUGH SHO .....Respondent Through:

Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL

O R D E R

% 10.11.2025 1.

It has been informed by learned APP for State that the charges are yet to be framed in the matter.

2.

After hearing arguments for over half an hour, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh at an appropriate stage in accordance with the law. 3.

Leave and liberty, as prayed for, are granted. 4.

Accordingly, the present petition along with pending applications, if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. AJAY DIGPAUL, J NOVEMBER 10, 2025 gs/dd The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/11/2025 at 12:26:24