High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/385/2016

Sandeep v. State

2017-03-17Hon'Ble Mr. Justice G.S.Sistani,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vinod Goel1 pages

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 385/2016 SANDEEP ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Vaibhav Sinha, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocate for the State.

Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans, Advocate for the boy(Arjun).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL

O R D E R

% 17.03.2017 This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the parent of the missing girl Sheetal. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that binding the parties to the statement made in Court on 10.01.2017 and 02.02.2017, the present petition can be dismissed as withdrawn as the daughter has been produced and handed over to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn binding the parties to the statement made on 10.01.2017 and 02.02.2017. G.S.SISTANI, J VINOD GOEL, J MARCH 17, 2017 pst /