Pavan Gandas v. Municipal Corporation Of Delhi & ANR.
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6579/2025 PAVAN GANDAS .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Divye Puri, Adv.
versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through:
Mr. Vikramaditya Singh, Adv. for RMr. Sanjiv Sharma and Mr. Siddant Rai Sethi, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R
% 07.11.2025 1.
The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to respondent no.1 for restraining the misuse of residential property bearing No. 52B/9, Kishan Garh, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070 for commercial purposes by respondent no. 2.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 submits that the petitioner is the son of respondent no. 2, which fact has not been disclosed in the present writ petition.
3.
It is further submitted that the petitioner has raised certain property disputes, as well with respect to the properties owned by respondent no. 2. 4.
On a pointed query by this Court, as to where the aforesaid facts have been disclosed in the petition, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it is clear from the Memo of Parties that he had disclosed the name of petitioner's father.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
5.
The aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner is unacceptable. Clearly, the petitioner, being the son, is trying to settle personal scores with his father, by impleading him as respondent no. 2. 6.
The Court will not go into the inter-se disputes between the parties or become a tool for the purposes of settling personal scores. 7.
A Status Report has been filed on behalf of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi ("MCD"), relevant portions of which, read as under: "xxx xxx xxx The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
"
8.
Perusal of the aforesaid Status Report shows that the MCD has already taken cognizance of the misuse in the property in question. 9.
The MCD is enjoined upon to take action, in accordance with law, to ensure that only activities, which are permissible as per law, are carried out from the premises in question.
10.
This Court takes note of the statement made by learned counsel appearing for the MCD that as on today, there is no misuse of the property in question and no unauthorized activity is being carried out from therein. 11.
Needless to state, in case the respondent no. 2 is aggrieved by any action on the part of the MCD, his right to seek remedies, in accordance with law, is reserved.
12.
With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
MINI PUSHKARNA, J NOVEMBER 7, 2025/KR The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.