Rishab Garg @ Rishabh Garg v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.
$~92 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4152/2024 & CRL. MA 15750/2024 RISHAB GARG @ RISHABH GARG ..... Petitioner Through:
Mr. Rohit Kalra, Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Mr. Sudhir Sharma, Mr.
Manoj Srivastava, Advocates with petitioner in person.
versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through:
Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for State with SI Amit Beniwal PS Vivek Vihar, Delhi.
Mr.
B.K.
Pandey, Ms.
Pragati Kumari, Advocates for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R
% 21.05.2024 1.
The present proceedings are instituted under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner seeking quashing of FIR No. 39/2018 registered under Sections 325/341/427 IPC at Police Station Vivek Vihar, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. 2.
As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioner gave fist blows to the complainant on account of some argument relating to car parking.
3.
Mr. Aashneet Singh, learned APP for the State, on instructions, submits that the petitioner is the only accused and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim in the present case. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the present FIR was registered due to misunderstanding and with the intervention of family members and friends, parties have amicably settled their disputes vide compromise deed dated 17.05.2024, a copy of which has been placed on record. In terms of the said settlement, complainant is now left with no claim or grievance against the petitioner.
5.
The petitioner and respondent No.2, who are present in Court, have been identified by their counsel as well as the I.O./ SI Amit Beniwal PS Vivek Vihar, Delhi who is present in the Court. 6.
The petitioner has shown remorse for his conduct and undertakes not to repeat the same in future. Respondent No. 2 also states that he has entered into the aforementioned compromise out of his own free will, volition and without any coercion. He further states that he has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed.
7.
The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.
8.
In view of the above facts and considering that no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to payment of cost of Rs.20,000/- to be deposited by the petitioner with the Delhi State Legal Services Authority within a period of two weeks from today. The amount so deposited shall be utilized by the Delhi State Legal Services Authority for providing counselling/psychological support to POCSO victims requiring such assistance.
9.
Proof evidencing receipt of deposit shall be filed with the I.O. 10.
A copy of this order be communicated to the Member Secretary, The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Delhi State Legal Services Authority for intimation. 11.
With the above directions, the petition is disposed of alongwith miscellaneous application.
12.
In case proof of deposit of cost is not filed within two weeks, the IO shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application in this regard. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MAY 21, 2024/rd The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.