Ct/Carpenter Mahipal Singh v. Union Of India And ORS

$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7295/2024, CM APPL. 30478/2024 CT/CARPENTER MAHIPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Kangan Roda, Sr. PC with Mr. Deepak Tanwar, GP with Mr. Rajdev Kumar, Mr. Hitesh Batra and Ms. Diksha, Advs. for UOI with Mr. N.S. Bisht, AC, Mr. N. Vichen Singh, SI, Mr. D. Prahlad, SI and Mr. N. Khan, HC (CISF)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

O R D E R

% 21.05.2024 CM APPL. 30478/2024 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 7295/2024 1.

This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:

"It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:- A. Issue of a Writ of Certiorari quashing order dated 02.03.2024 issued by the Respondents, denying the benefit of the Old Pension Scheme in accordance with CCS (Pension) The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 23:58:16

Rules, 1972 to the Petitioner who had been recruited pursuant to notifications/advertisements issued before 01.01.2004, i.e, before the New Pension Scheme (NPS) was implemented B. Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to extend the benefit of Old Pension Scheme to the Petitioner C. Issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to transfer the amount (corpus) held in NPS Tier I account to GPF account of the Petitioner, which relief has already been granted to Petitioner's batchmates.

D. Pass any other appropriate order / direction which this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper."

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the issue which has been raised in this writ petition is pending consideration with the authorities on a representation made by the petitioner and as such, wishes to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3.

Liberty shall be with the petitioner to seek such remedy as available in law, if the representation is decided against the petitioner. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J GIRISH KATHPALIA, J MAY 21, 2024/aky The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 23:58:16