Mohd. Johar v. State

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1835/2019 MOHD JOHAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abdul Sattar, Advocate

Versus

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Dr. M.P. Singh, APP for State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING)

O R D E R

% 22.07.2020 CRL. M.A. 9689/2020 (early hearing) 1.

The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking early hearing of the bail application to withdraw the same. 2.

The application is allowed, as prayed for.

3.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 1835/2019 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present bail application to press the same before the trial court as he submits that the victim has already been examined.

2.

Leave, as prayed, is granted.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the Police Station in the 'Cause List' has been wrongly shown as Surajpur Gautam Buddha Nagar whereas the correct name of Police Station is Kalindi Kunj. BAIL APPLN. 1835/2019

4.

The Registry shall make necessary corrections in the 'Cause List' as well as in the records.

5.

The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. 6.

The date already fixed in terms of the general directions issued during the period of lockdown, stands cancelled.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J JULY 22, 2020 p'ma BAIL APPLN. 1835/2019