Pankaj Jain v. Instachip Enterprises And ANR

$~22 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(COMM) 429/2024 with I.A. 30136/2024 and I.A. 30137/2024 PANKAJ JAIN .....Plaintiff Through:

Mr. Prakhar Sharma, Advocate versus INSTACHIP ENTERPRISES AND ANR .....Defendants Through:

Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

% 23.12.2024 1.

The matter has been settled in the mediation proceedings between the parties.

2.

The Settlement Agreement dated 21st November, 2024 has been placed on record and the same bears the signatures of the authorized representatives of the parties and their respective counsel. 3.

I have gone through the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find the same to be lawful.

4.

The parties shall remain bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

5.

The present suit is decreed in terms of prayer clauses 40 (a) to (c) of the plaint.

6.

Decree sheet be drawn up accordingly. The Settlement Agreement shall form part of the decree.

7.

Since the matter has been settled in mediation proceedings, the CS(COMM) 429/2024 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 15:27:27

Registry is directed to issue a certificate of refund of 100% of the Court Fees in favour of the plaintiff, in terms of Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, read with Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. 8.

All pending applications stand disposed of.

AMIT BANSAL, J DECEMBER 23, 2024 ds CS(COMM) 429/2024 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 15:27:27