Pappu @ Raju v. State

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2057/2019 PAPPU @ RAJU ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Sunita Arora, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with Mr. Karan Jeet Rai Sharma, Advocate for the State/Respondent no.1 with SI Darendra, P.S.: Chhawla

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI

O R D E R

% 23.10.2019 The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. P.C) has been filed seeking release of the petitioner on furlough for a period of one month for partition of the ancestral property.

Status report has been filed. The fact regarding the partition of the ancestral property has been verified by the Inspector Rajvir Singh, Station House Officer, P.S.: Chhawala, New Delhi.

Learned ASC states that the petitioner has already been granted furlough in the month of January, 2019 and April, 2019. Heard. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to be released on furlough for a period of one month from the date of his release on his executing personal bond in the sum of

Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent, subject to following conditions: (i) The petitioner will not leave National Capital Territory of Delhi without prior permission of the Court;

(ii) He will furnish to the Investigating Officer his mobile number and residential address where he will stay during the period of parole; (iii) He will report to the concerned Station House Officer (SHO) / Investigating Officer (IO), on every Monday;

(iv) In case of any change in his residential address or the mobile number, he will inform the SHO/IO;

The petition is disposed of, in above terms.

BRIJESH SETHI, J OCTOBER 23, 2019 savita