Kumar Pal v. State

$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 418/2018 and CRL.M.A. 2459/2018 KUMAR PAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Jaideep Malik, Advocate.

Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC with ASI Ramdev.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

O R D E R

% 09.02.2018 The furlough is not permitted in view of the Furlough Guidelines 2010. The petitioner is a convict under Section 20 of the NDPS Act; he is not entitled to remissions; the three years of Annual Good Conduct remissions thus cannot be considered qua the petitioner.

Dismissed with liberty granted to the petitioner to seek parole, if so required.

INDERMEET KAUR, J FEBRUARY 09, 2018 SU