Pritam Saini v. State

$~26 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1847/2019 PRITAM SAINI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sudarshan Rajan with Ms. Daljit, Ms. Anjali Kumar, Mr. Ramesh Rawat, Advocates.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State.

Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nawab Singh Jaglan, Mr. Rahul Vidhiya and Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocates for complainant.

Mr. Sumer Singh Boparai with Mr.

Mr. Vidhushi Nishank, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 21.08.2019 1.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that in case directions are issued for expeditious recording of the prosecution evidence, he shall not press this petition at this stage.

2.

In view of the above and keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since and all public witnesses/medical witnesses have already been examined and only formal/official witnesses are remaining to be examined, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the recording of the prosecution evidence and endeavour to conclude the same by 31.12.2019. The Trial Court BAIL APPLN. 1847/2019

shall also expedite the trial.

3.

In view of the above directions, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. 4.

Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid directions.

5.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J AUGUST 21, 2019 st BAIL APPLN. 1847/2019