Mohd Khalid Ansari v. Union Of India And ORS

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 957/2017 MOHD KHALID ANSARI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Anjum Javed, Mr. Devendra Kr.

And Mr. Faran Ahmed, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for R1.

Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb and Mr. Tanveer Zaki, Advs. for R2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

O R D E R

% 03.10.2018 Considering the fact that the Chairman of the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions has been appointed as it is indicated to us, the petition so far as it seeks a mandamus for appointment of a Chairman, is rendered infructuous.

With regard to the allegations made that the review applications were being decided by the members, who are not judicial members and the breach of law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India v. R. Gandhi, President, Madras Bar Association are concerned, we direct the

Commission to ensure that henceforth all proceedings, statutory in nature are held and decided by an appropriate bench in accordance with the aforesaid judgment and requirement of the statute.

The petition stands disposed of.

CM. No. 4395/2017 Dismissed as infructuous.

CHIEF JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO, J OCTOBER 03, 2018/jg