Adidas India Marketing Pvt Ltd v. Ivy Stores & ORS.

$~93 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 401/2025 ADIDAS INDIA MARKETING PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Deepak Jaiswal, Adv.

versus IVY STORES & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Rohan Ved, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

O R D E R

% 20.05.2025 1.

This is a petition filed under Section 29A(4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by a period of 9 months.

2.

It is stated that the delay has occurred on account of the lengthy evidence of the parties.

3.

Issue notice.

4.

Mr. Ved, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and has no objection to the petition being allowed. 5.

For the reasons noted above, I am of the view that sufficient cause has been explained for the delay.

6.

The petition is allowed and the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of 9 months from today.

7.

The period from 25.11.2024 till today stands regularised. 8.

The petition is disposed of.

JASMEET SINGH, J MAY 20, 2025/DM Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:29:39