← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./5787/2023

Tarun Kumar v. Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

2024-02-23Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri2 pages

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5787/2023 TARUN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate with petitioner in person versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with WSI Vinod Kapoor and ASI Satish Respondent No.2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 23.02.2024 1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.583/2019 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at P.S. Sagarpur, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

2.

The present FIR is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute between the complainant/respondent No. 2 (wife) and the petitioner (husband). 3.

Learned APP for the State submits that in the present case the petitioner is the only accused person and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled their dispute on 20.03.2023 before Mediation Centre, Dwarka Courts, Delhi The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/02/2024 at 11:15:11

and that petitioner and respondent No.2 have been living together since the last one year. The petitioner assures to look after respondent No.2 and further assures that no such incident would be repeated in future. The assurance given on behalf of the petitioner is accepted and taken on record. He is made bound by the same.

5.

The petitioner, who is present in the Court, has been identified by his counsel and the Investigating Officer. Respondent No.2, who is also present in Court, has been identified by the I.O.

6.

Respondent No.2 states that she has entered into the aforesaid mediation settlement with her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed.

7.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

8.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

9.

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

10.

The petition is disposed of in the above terms. 11.

Respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to revive the proceedings in case she remains aggrieved.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J FEBRUARY 23, 2024/na The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/02/2024 at 11:15:11