← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/12303/2022

Pawan Kumar Tyagi v. Government Of National Capital Territory Of Delhi And Others

2022-11-21Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva,Tushar Rao Gedela2 pages

$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 21.11.2022 + W.P.(C) 12303/2022 PAWAN KUMAR TYAGI ..... Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND OTHERS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Petitioners : Mr. Suresh Sharma, Advocate For the Respondents : Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N.K. Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik and Ms.

Aliza Alam, Advocates for R-1 & 2 Mr. D. Verma, Advocate for R-3 Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Sr. Panel Counsel with Ms. Mansi Bhatia, Mr. Bhupesh Pandotra and Mr. Pratyush Bhandwaj, Advocates for R-4

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the Respondents submits that the medical cards of the Petitioner and his wife is ready. However, the same needs to be countersigned by the Petitioner.

By:VINOD KUMAR 16:15:47 W.P.(C) 12303/2022 1

2.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is not available in Court today, however, he shall meet the counsel for the Respondents and countersign the medical card. 3.

The original medical card has been produced in Court, perused and returned to the learned counsel for the Respondents, who shall hand over the same to the Petitioner on Petitioner signing the same. 4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner further points out that on account of delay on behalf of the Respondents in correctly endorsing the medical card, he has had to spend money from his pocket and is claiming reimbursement in accordance with the Rules.

5.

Respondents are directed to process the bills of the Petitioner and admissible bills in accordance with the Rules be reimbursed. 6.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in view of the above direction, no further orders are called for and he wants closure of the proceedings.

7.

In view of the above, petition is disposed of. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J NOVEMBER 21, 2022/yg By:VINOD KUMAR 16:15:47 W.P.(C) 12303/2022 2