Naresh Kumar Mishra v. State Of NCT Delhi

$~10& 11 * IN T HE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 293/201 ;■ + .....Applicant Through Mr. Hans Raj Sin^ and Mr. Rishi ;; Raghav, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT DELHI Respondent Through Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State ; Insp. Tej Ram, PS Bhajanpura Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya, Adv. for ■ the Complainant BAIL APPLN. 294/2016 i + NARESH KUMAR MISHRA;

... .Applicant Through ■ Mr. Hans Raj Singh and Mr. Rishi '■ Raghav, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT DELHI Respondent Through i Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State Insp. Tej Ram, PS Bhajanpura Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya, Adv. for the Complainant

CORAM:

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTHMRIDUL -

ORDER

% 09.05.20161 Mr. Ravi Nayak, learned APi' appearing on behalf of the official respondent, on instructions from the Investigating Officer in the subject FIR namely Inspector Tej Ram, Police Station- Bhajanpura, Delhi, invites my attention to the circumstance that the charge-sheet in the subject FIR has been filed against the applicants herein, as far back as on 16.11.2015. By:AMULYA

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants herein, in view of the changed circumstance as recorded hereinabove, seeks leave to withdraw the present bail applications with liberty to approach the trial Court m this behalf with an appropriate application, within a period of one week from today.

This submission is not opposed by counsel appearing on behalf of the official respondent as well as by counsel for the complainant herein. It is, therefore, directed accordingly.

The present bail applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to move the concerned Sessions Court, where the trial is underway. The bail applications are disposed of accordir/hly. SIDteARTH MRIDUL, J MAY 09, 2016 ^ sd^