Manpreet Singh & ORS v. The State & ANR

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3824/2019 & Crl.M.A.32755/2019 MANPREET SINGH & ORS .... Petitioners Through Mr. Rajinder Singh and Mr.

Naman Garg, Advs. with the petitioners in person versus THE STATE & ANR .... Respondents Through Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP with ASI Ramesh Kumar, PS Malviya Nagar, Delhi Mr. Simar Pal Singh and Mr.

Gurpreet Walia, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R D E R

% 20.09.2019 1.

Issue notice.

2.

Notice is accepted by the learned APP for the State as well as by the learned counsel for the respondent No.2. 3.

The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.381/2017 dated 29.9.2017, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC'), registered at P.S.: Malviya Nagar, New Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom. 4.

The petitioners and respondent No.2 as well as the learned

counsel for the parties submitted that the parties have settled their disputes on their own free will, without any force or coercion as is also evident from the proceedings before the Metropolitan Magistrate03, Mahila Court (South District), Saket, Delhi on 11.12.2018, in pursuance whereof, the marriage of the petitioner No.1 and the respondent No.2 stands dissolved vide decree of divorce dated 4.5.2019.

5.

Respondent No.2, who is present in Court, has reiterated the aforesaid facts and submitted that the petitioners have to pay the balance amount of Rs.7 lacs to her in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties. Respondent No.2 further submitted that in case the petitioners make the payment of the balance amount of Rs.7 lacs to her, she has no objection to the petition being allowed and the FIR being quashed.

6.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have brought a demand draft bearing No.203665 dated 2.8.2019 for an amount of Rs.7 lacs which has been handed over to the respondent No.2 today in the Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in view of the payment of the balance amount to the respondent No.2, the present petition may be allowed and the FIR may be quashed.

7.

The Investigating Officer ('IO'), who is present in Court, has identified the petitioners as well as respondent No.2 and has also verified the settlement arrived at between the parties. 8.

In view of the aforesaid circumstances and the settlement

arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the parties entangled in the criminal proceedings. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, FIR No.381/2017 dated 29.9.2017, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at P.S.: Malviya Nagar, New Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

9.

Petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending application is also disposed of.

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J SEPTEMBER 20, 2019/rk