Abdul Kadir Khan v. State & ANR

$~29 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 575/2018 ABDUL KADIR KHAN ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Satykam Saini, Adv. along with petitioner in person.

versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Dr. M.P. Singh, APP for State with SI Kamlesh, P.S. Sagarpur.

Mr. Anwar Khalil, Adv. for R-2 along with R-2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 07.02.2018 It is submitted that petitioners and respondent no.2 are related to each other. A quarrel took place between them on some trivial issue which led to registration of FIR No. 233/2015 under Sections 354(C)/500/506 IPC and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 at police station Sagarpur, on the complaint of respondent no.2. During the investigation, offence under Section 66 of the I.T. Act was converted to Section 67 of the I.T. Act. With the intervention of their elders in the family, petitioners and respondent no.2 have settled their disputes vide Compromise Deed dated 21st August, 2017, therefore, aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom may be quashed.

Respondent no.2 is present in Court and has been identified by SI Kamlesh of police station Sagarpur.

She submits that she has settled the matter with the petitioners of her own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. She has no objection in case the FIR is quashed. Keeping in mind that a settlement has been arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no.2 voluntarily, in the interest of justice, aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

FEBRUARY 07, 2018 ga