Rohtas Singh v. Rashmi Jain

$~6 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RFA 110/2012 and C.M. Appl. No. 3278/2018 ROHTAS SINGH ..... Appellant Through:

Mr. S. Chaturvedi and Mr. Manjit Mathur, Advocates with appellant in person.

versus RASHMI JAIN ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. O.P. Gupta, Ms. Neha Garg and Mr. Vikas Deep, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 12.07.2018 1.

Counsels for the parties state that this appeal be disposed of by a consent order that the appellant will vacate the suit premises on or before 31.1.2019, and when the suit premises are vacated by the appellant and possession handed over to the respondent, the respondent at that time will pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- to the appellant. Appellant will clear all charges towards electricity, water, etc. as payable for the suit premises till the appellant stays in the same. It is also agreed that whatever amount has been received by the respondent towards every month's mesne profits will be retained by the respondent and if there are any arrears payable by the appellant to the respondent with respect to orders already passed by this Court, the RFA 110/2012

said arrears will be cleared within a period of four weeks from today. With effect from August, 2018, however, it is agreed that no mesne profits per month would be payable till 31.1.2019 or any earlier date when the appellant will vacate the suit premises. The respective understandings between the parties as recorded in this order will be in the form of undertakings to this Court.

2.

This appeal is accordingly disposed of in terms of the aforesaid consent order, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J JULY 12, 2018 AK RFA 110/2012