Seema Sharma And ORS. v. State NCT Of Delhi And ANR.

$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3664/2025 SEEMA SHARMA AND ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

None.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for State with Mr.

Lalit Luthra, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

O R D E R

% 23.05.2025 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CRL.M.A. 16141/2025 (exemption from filing complete TCR) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CRL.M.C. 3664/2025 2.

The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 194/2018 of PS Vivek Vihar for offences under Section 420/406/120B/34 IPC. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the petitioners is that they floated some chit fund committee and investments scheme named Lucky Scheme in which many persons invested their money, but subsequently the petitioners refused to pay back. Mediation was carried out between the present petitioners and the complainant de facto. It appears that the mediator failed to notice that apart from the complainant de facto, there were a few other victims also. Further, it is informed by learned prosecutor, accepting notice, that against the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/05/2025 at 15:24:39

present petitioner no.2, the Trial Court has already issued non-bailable warrants on 20.05.2025. Not only this, learned prosecutor on instructions from IO/SI Manvendra submits that even the complainant de facto is not aware about the present proceedings.

3.

Since none appears for petitioners, matter is passed over. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J MAY 23, 2025/DR Present :

None for petitioners APP for State with respondent no. 2 in person, identified by IO/SI Manvinder.

4.

In pre-lunch session also none appeared for petitioners, so matter was passed over. Even in this post lunch session, none has appeared on behalf of petitioners.

5.

In furtherance of circumstances mentioned in pre-lunch session at the call of the case, respondent no. 2 has appeared on being informed by the IO. Respondent no. 2 submits that she did not receive any money from petitioners.

6.

As recorded in previous call, there are multiple victims of cheating in this case.

7.

Since none appears even in second call, the petition is dismissed in default.

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J MAY 23, 2025/as Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/05/2025 at 15:24:39