← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./967/2014

Pankaj Vashisth v. State & ANR

2017-08-17Hon'Ble Mr. Justice I.S.Mehta1 pages

$~5 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 967/2014 & CRL.M.A.6139/2016 PANKAJ VASHISTH ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Ravi Sharma, Adv.

versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr.Izhar Ahmad, APP for State SI Yogesh Kumar, PS-Malviya Nagar Mr.Atif Khan, Adv. with Ms.Radhika Arora, Adv. for R-2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 17.08.2017 Counsel for the petitioner submits that charge has been framed and in view of the same he wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh petition challenging the framing of charge. The prayer is allowed.

In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. All pending application(s) (if any) also stand disposed of. As prayed, copy of this order be given dasti. I.S.MEHTA, J AUGUST 17, 2017/sr