Avinash Madhava Murthy v. Vineeta Rao

$~83 * IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 830/2025 AVINASH MADHAVA MURTHY .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Dhruv Chawla, Advocate.

versus VINEETA RAO .....Respondent Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

O R D E R

% 26.05.2025 [Hearing has been conducted through Video Conferencing] 1.

This petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the settlement deed dated 09th February 2023 with the facilitation of the Counselling Cell, Family Court, Saket.

2.

As per settlement, respondent had agreed to support the petition for quashing of FIR No. 16/2022 registered at Police Station Sarita Vihar, New Delhi under Sections 498A/406/323/34 IPC.

3.

Counsel for petitioner states that he has received an affidavit of no objection, on the second day after this petition was filed. 4.

Accordingly, petitioner does not wish to press this petition. Petition is disposed of in view of the above observations. 5.

Counsel for petitioner states that since respondent has not been The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 01:38:45

complying despite settlement, they have incurred various litigations costs, as the petitioner is in Mumbai.

6.

Needles to state, the petitioner is at liberty to agitate before competent court for grant of costs.

7.

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J MAY 26, 2025/RK/tk The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 01:38:45