← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/1092/2018

Janardhana Reddy College Of Education v. National Council For Teacher Education And ORS.

2019-09-19Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice C.Hari Shankar4 pages

Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

$-14 to 65

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

W.P.(C) 8425/2017 & CM Nos. 34694/2017, 35956/2018, + 37788/2018 SHRI BHAGWAT PRASAD SINGH MEMORIAL B.ED.

COLLEGE AND ORS.

Petitioners versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR.

Respondents + W.P.(C) 6049/2017 + W.P.(C) 6533/2017 + W.P.(C) 7071/2017 + W.P.(C) 8124/2017 & 42610/2018 + W.P.(C) 8184/2017 + W.P.(C) 8373/2017 & 39715/2017 + W.P.(C) 8512/2017 + W.P.(C) 8645/2017 + W.P.(C) 8700/2017 36599/2017 + W.P.(C) 9153/2017 + W.P.(C) 9188/2017 + W.P.(C) 9190/2017 + W.P.(C) 9193/2017 + W.P.(C) 9197/2017 + W.P.(C) 9201/2017 + W.P.(C) 9215/2017 + W.P.(C) 9219/2017 + W.P.(C) 9260/2017 + W.P.(C) 9261/2017 + W.P.(C) 9549/2017 + .

W.P.(C) 9550/2017 + W.P.(C) 9585/2017 + W.P.(C) 9595/2017 + W.P.(C) 9596/2017 and CM Nos. 25149-25150/2017 ^ CM No. 27097/2017 CM No. 29394/2017 CM Nos. 33407/2017, 39695-39696/2017 CM No. 33617/2017 CM Nos. 34493-34494/2017, 39690/2017 CM Nos. 35051-35052/2017 CM Nos. 35516/2017 & 45143/2017 CM Nos. 35686-35687/2017 & CM No. 37449/2017 CM No. 37558/2017 CM No. 37609/2017 CM No. 37618/2017 CM No. 37628/2017 CM No. 37636/2017 CM No. 37665/2017 CM Nos. 37671/2017 8l 45142/2017 CM No. 37848/2017 CM No. 37849/2017 CM No. 38848/2017 CM No. 38850/2017 CM No. 39015/2017 CM No. 39043/2017 CM No. 39046/2017

+ W.P.c 10224/2017, CM No. 41714/2017 + W.P.c 10256/2017, CM No. 41858/2017 + W.P.c 10693/2017, CM No. 43849/2017 + W.P. c 10968/2017 + W.P. c 11101/2017, CMNos. 45381-45382/2017 + W.P. c 1092/2018, CM No. 7220/2018 + W.P. c 1259/2018, CM No. 5254/2018 + W.P. c 1399/2018 + W.P. c 1401/2018 + W.P.c 1413/2018 + W.P.c 1414/2018 + W.P. c 1415/2018 + W.P. c 1416/2018 + W.P. c 1418/2018 + W.P. c 1473/2018 + W.P. c 1763/2018, CM No. 7279/2018 + W.P. c 1973/2018, CM Nos. 8111-8112/2018 + W.P. c 3618/2018, CM No. 14293/2018 + W.P. c 4938/2018 + W.P.c 4956/2018 + W.P. c 7495/2018 + W.P. c 7496/2018 + W.P.c 7497/2018 + W.P.c 7498/2018 + W.P. c 7499/2018 + W.P. c 7500/2018 + W.P. c 11203/2018, CMNo.

43521/2018 Present?

Ms. Binisa Mohanty Adv. for Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Ravi Kant and Mr. Mayank Manish, Advs.

Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, Mr. Animesh Kumar, Mr. Sumit Kumar and Mr. Ashutosh Thakur, Advs. Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr.

Divyank Rana and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advs.

For Petitioners:

For Respondents:

Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Shivam Singh, Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Mr. Yuvraj

Sharma, Mr. Jaideep Khanna, Ms.

Preeti Kumra, Advs.

Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Kavindra Gill, Adv.

Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Adv.

Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Mr. Mr. M.K. Tiwari, Mr. Ramneek Mishra and Mr. Abhishek Rana, Advs.

Ms. Supama Srivastava, Advocate with Mr.

Tushar Mathur, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ■'•V

ORDER

% 19.09.2019 Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the main J challenge in these writ petitions is about the delegation of powers by the National Council for Teacher Education to Quality Council of India. It is also stated that the assessment by the Quality Council of India is being withdrawn.

Hence, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that nothing is now left to be decided in these writ petitions. Nonetheless, it is submitted that liberty may be reserved with these petitioners to approach this Court, in case they are aggrieved by the actions of the respondents.

Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that detailed counter-affidavit has been filed wherein it is mentioned that the delegation of powers to the Quality Council of India is now being withdrawn and the respondents will act as per the report of Justice J.S. Verma Committee.

"n In view of the above observations, these writ petitions are disposed of.

In case these petitioners are aggrieved by the actions taken by the respondents, they are at liberty to challenge the same before this Court.

Interim relief granted, if any, stands vacated. '7CHIEF JUSTICE C.HARI shankar; j SEPTEMBER 19, 2019 dsn