Sqn Ldr Cheshta Shankar v. Union Of India & ORS.

$~S-20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12314/2021 SQN LDR CHESHTA SHANKAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Ajit Kakkar, Advocate.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through Mr.Anil Kaushik, CGSC with Mr.Anirudh Shukla, Advocate.

% Date of Decision: 29th October, 2021

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA MANMOHAN, J. (Oral) C.M.No.38743/2021 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No.12314/2021 & C.M.No.38744/2021 th 1.

Present writ petition has been filed challenging the Signal dated 08 October, 2021 whereby the Petitioner has been posted to AFA, Dundigal, Hyderabad w.e.f. 15th November, 2021. Petitioner also seeks a direction to the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to continue her engagement at 29 Wg AF as her Last Leg posting.

2.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner was posted th March 2019 on co-location grounds as her to 29 Wg AF, Bamrauli w.e.f 25 husband was posted to 4 Arty Bde.

W.P.(C) 12314/2021 Page 1 of 3

3.

He states that the Petitioner was blessed with a daughter on 16th February 2021 and duly reported back at her 29 Wg at the end of her Maternity Leave on 29th June 2021. He states that the Petitioner has another daughter who is three years old.

4.

He emphasises that the Petitioner's husband has been posted to 630 th SATA BTY, Hathigarh w.e.f 25 March, 2021 which is a non-family station and the Petitioner's parents who are senior citizens have been suffering from multiple age-related ailments.

5.

He points out that the Petitioner has been receiving certain assistance and facilities from her current station authorities in this regard because of which she has been able to render her services efficiently and dedicatedly. He also emphasises that AFA, Dundigal is a training base with huge quantum of flying operations situated in a remote location and is not well equipped with the facilities being availed by the Petitioner at her current place of posting. 6.

He states that the Petitioner has preferred multiple applications i.e. in August, 2021 as well as on 13th October, 2021 requesting the Respondents for the screening of her Posting to AFA, but all her attempts have been in vain. 7.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that transfer is an exigency of service, especially in the Armed Forces. Further, the Petitioner has completed two years of co-location posting and is being transferred because her husband has now been transferred to a nonfamily station. 8.

This Court does not find any merit in the contention that the Petitioner should not be transferred, just because facilities at Bamrauli are better than the facilities provided at AFA, Dundigal. It is pertinent to mention that AFA, W.P.(C) 12314/2021 Page 2 of 3

Dundigal is neither a non-family station nor a station without any facilities. Consequently, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. 9.

At this stage, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner would like to file an application for pre-mature separation from service. 10.

Accordingly, this Court directs that, in the event, the Petitioner files a pre-mature separation from service application by 01st November, 2021, the same shall be disposed of by the Respondents in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within eight weeks. This Court clarifies that it has not commented on the merit of the pre-mature separation from service application to be filed by the Petitioner. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition along with pending application stands disposed of. MANMOHAN, J NAVIN CHAWLA, J OCTOBER 29, 2021 KA W.P.(C) 12314/2021 Page 3 of 3