Pinnacle Prints Pvt Ltd. v. The Union Of India & ORS.

$~28 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 977/2016 & CM No.4296/2016 (for stay) PINNACLE PRINTS PVT LTD.

..... Petitioner Through:

Ms.Mudita Sharma, Adv.

versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr.Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC for UOI.

Mr.Rajeev K. Panday & Mr.Nirmal Mishra, Advs. for R-2.

Ms.S. Phaltankar, Adv. for R-3, 8, 9 & 11.

Ms.Karuna Chhatwal & Mr.Joginder Sukhija, Advs. for R-5.

Mr.Sanjeev Sagar & Ms.Jasvinn Sharma, Advs. for R-6.

Mr.Arshad Chaudhary & Mr.Vinay Bisht, Advs. for R-7.

Mr.R.C. Chawla, Adv. for R-10.

Mr.Saurabh Chadda with Mr.Ishan Kashyap, Advs. for R-12.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA

O R D E R

% 11.11.2016 By consent of learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent No.2, the impugned order dated 13.01.2016 of the Appellate

Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, New Delhi in Appeal No.92/2015 is set aside only to the extent that the pending reference of the appellant-company before the BIFR has been dismissed as not maintainable. The reference before the BIFR shall stand restored and the parties may proceed with the reference. The writ petition as well as application are disposed of. INDIRA BANERJEE, J ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA, J NOVEMBER 11, 2016/gm