Sudip Kohli v. Sharda Aggarwal & ORS.

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 76/2021 & CM APPL. 10628/2022 & CM APPL. 17660/2022 SUDIP KOHLI .....Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Vikas Tiwari, Mr.

Kumar Deepraj, Ms. Arushi Rathore and Mr.

Rachit Gupta, Advocates.

versus SHARDA AGGARWAL & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. G.L.N.Murthy, Advocate for R-1.

Mr.

Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel for MCD/R-2.

SI Mamta, P.S.Dabri for R-4,

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 06.11.2024 1.

Learned counsel for the Revisionist seeks permission to withdraw the present Revision on the ground that it has become infructuous in view of the subsequent petitions which have been filed in Dwarka Court.

2.

It is clarified that it shall be without prejudice to the right of the Revisionist to continue with his defences in the Execution Petition that have been filed subsequently.

3.

Permitted to withdraw.

4.

Revision Petition is disposed of as infructuous. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J NOVEMBER 6, 2024 rk The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 13:54:43