Boby & ANR. v. State Of Delhi And ANR.

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 6316/2023 BOBY & ANR ..... Petitioners Through:

Ms. Shweta Yadav, Advocate with petitioners in person.

versus STATE OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Abhishek PS Nihal Vihar, Delhi.

Respondent No.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 29.05.2024 1.

The present proceedings are instituted under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No. 290/2018 registered under Sections 341/354/354D/509/34 IPC at Police Station Nihal Vihar, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. 2.

As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioners made inappropriate comments and misbehaved with the complainant causing her distress.

3.

Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, learned APP for the State, on instructions, submits that the petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim in the present case. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present FIR was registered due to misunderstanding and with the intervention of family The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/06/2024 at 14:43:12

members and friends, parties have amicably settled their disputes vide Compromise Deed dated 08.07.2022, a copy of which has been placed on record. In terms of the said settlement, complainant is now left with no claim or grievance against the petitioners.

5.

The petitioners, who are present in Court, have been identified by their counsel as well as the I.O./ SI Abhishek PS Nihal Vihar, Delhi. Respondent No. 2 is also present in Court and has been identified by the I.O. 6.

The petitioners have shown remorse for their conduct and undertake not to repeat the same in future. Respondent No. 2 also states that she has entered into the aforementioned compromise deed out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed. 7.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

8.

In view of the above facts and considering that no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed. 9.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MAY 29, 2024/rd The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/06/2024 at 14:43:12