Tapash Kumar Samaddar And ANR. v. Union Of India And ANR.

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9127/2019 TAPASH KUMAR SAMADDAR AND ANR.

..... Petitioners Through:

Mr.Rameezuddin Raja, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr.Niraj Kumar, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

O R D E R

% 26.08.2020 The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.

CM APPL. 20193/2020 (exemption from filing attested affidavits) For the reasons stated in the application and in view of the present prevailing situation, the present application is allowed. However, the applicant is directed to file duly signed and affirmed affidavits within a period of one week and the requisite Court fee within a period of 72 hours from the date of resumption of regular functioning of the Court. The application is disposed of.

CM APPL. 20192/2020 (for withdrawal of the petition) with W.P.(C) 9127/2019 C.M.No.20192/2020 has been filed by the petitioner for withdrawal of W.P.(C) No.9127/2019.

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are permitted to KUMAR Location:

16:54:57 W.P.(C) 9127/2019 Page 1 of 2

withdraw the writ petition.

Accordingly, C.M.No.20192/2020 is allowed and disposed of. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

CHIEF JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 26, 2020/ns KUMAR Location:

16:54:57 W.P.(C) 9127/2019 Page 2 of 2