Pawan Kumar v. Union Of India & ORS.

$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11622/2023 PAWAN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through:

None.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Rahul Sharma, CGSC for UOI with Mr.Vinod Tiwari, GP.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

O R D E R

% 21.09.2023 CM APPL. 49150/2023 1.

This is an application on behalf of Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate contending that his presence has not been noted in judgment dated 01.09.2023 though he had appeared for the respondents. The Officer, who was present on that date, confirms that Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate had appeared on the said date.

2.

In view of the above, the application is allowed. 3.

The presence of Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate shall be read in judgment dated 01.09.2023 as also having appeared for the respondents. 4.

This order shall be uploaded as a corrigendum to judgment dated 01.09.2023.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J MANOJ JAIN, J SEPTEMBER 21, 2023/st By:SONIA THAPLIYAL 13:20:28