Madhu Jain v. Saroj Garg & Others

$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 671/2014 MADHU JAIN ..... Plaintiff Through :

Mr. J. P. Jain, Adv.

versus SAROJ GARG & OTHERS ..... Defendants Through :

Defendant no.1 in person.

Mr. S. C. Malhotra and Ms. Dona Dutta, Advs. for defendant no.2 with defendant no.2 in person.

Mr. Dinesh Kumar Gupta and Mr.

Vidit Gupta, Advs. for D-3 to 6 with defendant no.3 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 01.09.2015 Parties have settled their disputes before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre on the terms and conditions as stipulated in Settlement Agreement dated 18th August, 2015, which has been signed by the plaintiff and defendant nos.1 to 5.

As regards defendant no.6 is concerned, she is being represented by her mother, that is, defendant no.4 who has signed not only for herself but also for defendant no.6. Authority letter given by defendant no.6 shows that defendant no.4 had authorised her to settle the disputes on her behalf. This authority letter has been annexed

with the Settlement Agreement, which is marked as 'Mark C-1'. Parties shall remain bound by the terms of settlement. Suit is decreed in terms of 'Mark C-1'.

Since parties have settled their disputes through the process of mediation, let court fee be refunded to the plaintiff and necessary certificate in this regard be issued by the Registry.

Miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

SEPTEMBER 01, 2015 dk