Mr. Anoop Kumar v. The State (Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi) & ANR.

$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3850/2025 MR. ANOOP KUMAR .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate.

versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for State with Ms. Pushpa Singh and Ms. Sandhya Sisodia, Advocates Mr. M Hasibuddin, Advocate for R-2 and R-2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 30.05.2025 CRL.M.A. 16844/2025 (exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 3850/2025 3.

By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR bearing No. 08/2024, registered at Police Station Jaitpur, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter „IPC').

4.

Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Pant, the learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

5.

The petitioner and respondent no.2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) concerned.

6.

Brief facts of the case are that the marriage between petitioner and respondent no. 2 had been solemnized at Delhi on 16.01.2012, in accordance with Hindu rites and ceremonies. It is stated that one male child was born on 30.09.2014 out of the said wedlock. It is further stated that matrimonial disputes had arisen between the parties due to which they have been residing separately. Upon the complaint being filed by respondent no. 2, the present FIR came to be registered against the petitioner. It is stated that with the intervention of family and friends, the parties have now amicably settled their disputes and the petitioner and respondent no. 2 have been living together with their minor child since October, 2024. 7.

On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 who has been identified by the IO concerned, has categorically stated that she has entered into compromise out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. Therefore, she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. The statement of the parties to the said effect had been recorded by the learned Joint Registrar (Judicial) on 28.05.2025.

8.

In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, and without any coercion, and no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. 9.

Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 08/2024, registered at Police Station The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Jaitpur, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

10.

In view of above, the present petition stands disposed of. 11.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MAY 30, 2025/vc Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.