Sarabjeet @ Sabba v. State NCT Of Delhi

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 246/2017 SARABJEET @ SABBA ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr. K. Singhal, Ms. Prasanna, Advs.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by:

Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with Insp. Tejpal PS Rajouri Garden.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 02.05.2017 After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has been in custody for six years in a case which is based on circumstantial evidence and till now the evidence of the prosecution has not been completed. He prays that the trial be expedited for hearing. Learned APP for the State on instructions submits that out of 28 witnesses cited by the prosecution 22 have already been examined and only 6 formal witnesses remain to be examined and they would be expedited. In view of the fact that the petitioner has been in custody for about six years, the learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of six months. No further orders are called for in the Bail Application at this stage. BAIL APPLN. 246/2017

Petition is dismissed.

Copy of the order be communicated to the learned Trial Court by the Registry.

Order dasti.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

MAY 02, 2017 'ga'

BAIL APPLN. 246/2017