High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./699/2012

Shilpa Abrol & ANR v. Rahul Abrol

2016-11-21Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul2 pages

$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 699/2012 SHILPA ABROL & ANR ..... Petitioner Represented by:

None versus RAHUL ABROL ..... Respondent Represented by:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 21.11.2016 Crl.M.A. 18022/2016 For the reasons stated in the application delay of 26 days in re-filing of the application is condoned.

Application is disposed of.

Crl.M.A. 18021/2016 By this application the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition, however despite pass-over none is present on behalf of the petitioner. Considering the fact that even on the last date none was present on behalf of the petitioner, it is apparent that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the case.

Consequently, Crl.M.A. 18021/2016 is allowed permitting the petitioner to withdraw the petition.

CRL.M.C. 699/2012

CRL.M.C. 699/2012 Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

NOVEMBER 21, 2016 'ga'

CRL.M.C. 699/2012