Ramayna Ispat Private Limited v. Union Of India & ANR.
$~5 (OS) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 203/2025 & I.A. 14761/2025 RAMAYNA ISPAT PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. S. Kashyap, Ms. Parul Tuli, Ms.
Nistha Gupta and Ms. Mahima, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr. Ritin Rai, Sr. Adv. with Ms.
Anuja Tiwari & Mr. Daksh Kadian, Advocates (Through VC)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R
% 23.06.2025 1.
Learned senior counsel for the Respondents states that Respondents have filed a review petition with respect to the order dated 28.05.2025, which is not listed today and they accordingly, seek an adjournment. 2.
At request of the Respondents, adjourned to 07.07.2025. 3.
In reply, learned senior counsel for the Petitioner states that due to the non-appointment of the nominee arbitrator by the Respondent, no hearing could be held by the Arbitral Tribunal on 14.06.2025. 4.
In response, learned senior counsel for the Respondents state that there is no urgency in the reliefs sought. He states that Respondents remain ready and willing to appoint an Arbitrator, however, they would first like to press the review petition.
5.
This Court has heard the parties. This petition was disposed of vide consent order dated 28.05.2025, with the understanding that this petition will be treated as a Section 17 petition and placed before the Arbitral Tribunal on 14.06.2025 for consideration. It is a matter of record that however, no The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:25:22
hearing could be held on 14.06.2025, as the Respondent failed to nominate its arbitrator despite having undertaken to appoint its nominee on or before 05.06.2025. In these facts, the Petitioner cannot be left remediless. 6.
Until the next date of hearing or constitution of Arbitral Tribunal, whichever is earlier, the parties are directed to maintain status quo. 7.
website of the Delhi High Court, www.delhihighcourt.nic.in, shall be treated as a certified copy of the order for the purpose of ensuring compliance. No physical copy of order shall be insisted by any authority/entity or litigant. MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 23, 2025/rhc Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:25:22