Pawan Kumar & ORS. v. A. Anbarasu

$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 956/2024 & CM APPLs. 34411/2024 & 34412/2024 PAWAN KUMAR & ORS.

..... Petitioners Through:

Ms. Prabha Mishra, Advocate.

versus A. ANBARASU ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Prashant Manchanda, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Nancy Shah, Ms.

Paruni, Mr. Angad Singh and Mr.

Vishal, Advocates.

(M): 9971879203 Email: prashant.manchandaasc@gmail.com

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA % 31.05.2024

O R D E R

CM APPL. 34412/2024 (for exemption) 1.

Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. 2.

Application is disposed of.

CONT.CAS(C) 956/2024 3.

The present petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of the th order dated 30 January, 2024, passed in W.P. (C) No. 1353/2024, wherein, the following directions were passed:- "xxx xxx xxx The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

2.

After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks an innocuous prayer to file a detailed representation/application before the Secretary, Public Works Department within two weeks.

3.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners .

xxx xxx xxx 6.

The petitioners are directed to file a detailed representation/application along with the certified copy of this order before the Secretary, Public Works Department within two weeks. After receiving the detailed representation/application, the Secretary, Public Works Department is directed to dispose of the detailed representation/application after hearing the petitioners and pass a detailed and reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within six weeks .

xxx xxx xxx"

(Emphasis Supplied) 4.

It is submitted that despite the aforesaid directions, the detailed representation of the petitioners, is yet to be decided. 5.

Issue notice.

6.

Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 7.

He submits that owing to the election duty, the representation of the petitioners could not be decided. However, he submits that further time of eight weeks, may be granted, to decide the representation of the petitioners. 8.

Considering the submissions made before this Court, it is directed that the respondent shall decide the detailed representation of the petitioners, within a period of eight weeks from today.

9.

The respondent is bound by the aforesaid time period and undertaking.

10.

Accordingly, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to revive the present The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

petition, in case, the grievance of the petitioners, still survives. 11.

In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J MAY 31, 2024 c The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.