Dr.Roshan Lal Matto v. UOI & ANR

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4035/2007 DR.ROSHAN LAL MATTO ..... Petitioner Through: None.

versus UOI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rohan Lal Goel, Advocate for UOI. Mr. T. Singhdev, Advocate with Ms. Biakthansangi, Ms. Puja Sarkar and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocates for respondent No.2/MCI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

O R D E R

% 25.02.2016 Learned counsel for respondent No.2 states the present writ petition has become infructuous inasmuch as the petitioner has crossed the age of 70 years and thus cannot be appointed as a teacher in any of the medical colleges.

In view thereof, present writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. MANMOHAN, J FEBRUARY 25, 2016 js