Capt. Bhagmal v. State
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2358/2019 CAPT. BHAGMAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Gautam Khazanchi and Mr.
Pradyuman Kaistha, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC for the State with SI Sanjeev Choudhary, P.S.:
Delhi Cantt.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI
O R D E R
% 19.09.2019 CRL.M.A.36271/2019(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.A. 36270 (early hearing) Notice.
Learned ASC accepts notice and submits that he has no objection if the present application is allowed.
Heard. In view of the above submission of learned APP and for the reasons given in the application, the present application is allowed and the date of hearing is preponed for today.
The earlier date i.e. 15.11.2019 stands cancelled.
W.P.(CRL) 2358/2019 The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. P.C) has been filed seeking release of the petitioner on parole for filing SLP in the Hon‟ble Supreme Court.
Status report has been handed over in Court and the same is placed on record.
Heard. In view the fact that SLP is to be filed by the petitioner, he is directed to be released on parole for a period of three weeks from the date of his release on his executing personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent, subject to following conditions:
(i) The petitioner will not leave National Capital Territory of Delhi without prior permission of the Court;
(ii) He will furnish to the Investigating Officer his mobile number and residential address where he will stay during the period of parole; (iii) He will report to the concerned Station House Officer (SHO) / Investigating Officer (IO), on every Monday;
(iv) In case of any change in his residential address or the mobile number, he will inform the SHO/IO;
The petition is disposed of, in above terms.
BRIJESH SETHI, J SEPTEMBER 19, 2019/savita