Manoj Kumar & ANR v. The State (Govt.Of NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4167/2019 & Crl.M.A.34199/2019 MANOJ KUMAR & ANR .... Petitioners Through Mr.Kartar Singh, Mr.Satya Prakash and Ms.Kumari Shweta, Advs. with the petitioners in person versus THE STATE (GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .... Respondents Through Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP with SI Subhash Chandra Mr. Neeraj Dahiya, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R D E R

% 17.12.2019 Crl.M.A.34199/2019 (for condonation of delay) In view of the cause submitted in the application, the delay in re-filing the petition is condoned. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4167/2019 1.

The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.670/2013 dated 9.12.2013, under Sections 498-A/406/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC'), registered at P.S.: Samay Pur Badli, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom. 2.

The petitioners and respondent No.2 as well as the learned

counsel for the parties submitted that the parties have settled their disputes on their own free will, without any force or coercion before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi on 4.6.2018, in pursuance whereof, the marriage of the petitioner No.1 and the respondent No.2 stands dissolved vide decree of divorce dated 26.11.2018.

3.

Respondent No.2, who is present in Court, has reiterated the aforesaid facts and submitted that the petitioners have to pay the balance amount of Rs.2 lacs to her in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties. Respondent No.2 further submitted that in case the petitioners make the payment of the balance amount of Rs.2 lacs to her, she has no objection to the petition being allowed and the FIR being quashed.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have brought a demand draft bearing No.586566 dated 22.10.2019 for an amount of Rs.2 lacs which has been handed over to the respondent No.2 today in the Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in view of the payment of the balance amount to the respondent No.2, the present petition may be allowed and the FIR may be quashed.

5.

The Investigating Officer ('IO'), who is present in Court, has identified the petitioners as well as respondent No.2 and has also verified the settlement arrived at between the parties. 6.

In view of the aforesaid circumstances and the settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no fruitful

purpose would be served in keeping the parties entangled in the criminal proceedings. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, FIR No.670/2013 dated 9.12.2013, under Sections 498-A/406/323/34 of the IPC, registered at P.S.: Samay Pur Badli, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

7.

Petition is disposed of in above terms.

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J DECEMBER 17, 2019/rk