Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. Amrapali Silicon City Pvt. Ltd.

$~4 to 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decision delivered on: 21.12.2023 ITA 329/2022 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 Mr Aseem Chawla, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Pratishtha and Mr Aditya Gupta, Advocates.

AMRAPALI SILICON CITY PVT. LTD.

(5) ITA 337/2022 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 Mr Aseem Chawla, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Pratishtha and Mr Aditya Gupta, Advocates.

AMRAPALI SILICON CITY PVT. LTD.

(6) ITA 340/2022 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 ..... Appellant Mr Aseem Chawla, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Pratishtha and Mr Aditya Gupta, Advocates.

AMRAPALI SILICON CITY PVT. LTD.

(7) ITA 341/2022 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 .....

Appellant Mr Aseem Chawla, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Pratishtha and Mr Aditya Gupta, Advocates.

AMRAPALI SAPPHIRE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD (8) ITA 343/2022 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 Mr Aseem Chawla, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Pratishtha and Mr Aditya Gupta, Advocates.

AMRAPALI SAPPHIRE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD (9) ITA 345/2022 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 Mr Aseem Chawla, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Pratishtha and Mr Aditya Gupta, Advocates.

AMRAPALI SAPPHIRE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD (10) ITA 646/2023 & CM APPL. 60497/2023 PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI 1 Mr Sanjeev Menon, Standing Counsel.

M/S AMRAPALI LEISURE VALLEY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):

1.

These appeals concern Assessment Years (AYs) 2011-12 [ITA No. 329/2022], 2014-15 [ITA No. 337/2022], 2012-13 [ITA No. 340/2022], 2011-12 [ITA No.341/2022], 2010-11 [ITA No. 343/2022], 2012-13 [ITA No. 345/2022] and 2011-12 [ITA No. 646/2023]. 2.

While ITAs 329/2022, 337/2022, 340/2022 assail the order dated 17.03.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, "Tribunal"], ITA 341/2022, 343/2022 and 345/2022 assail the order dated 08.04.2021 and ITA 646/2023 assails the order dated 17.06.2021. 2.1. In the orders dated 08.04.2021 and 17.06.2021, the Tribunal has relied upon the order dated 17.03.2021 and dismissed the appeals filed by the

assessee and the revenue in view of the respondent/assesse undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). 3.

We have been informed several times by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the appellant/revenue that the respondents/companies, which are the part of the Amrapali Group, are undergoing insolvency proceedings.

4.

We have also asked counsel for the appellant/revenue time and again as to the person upon whom notice needs to be served.

5. It was also conveyed to us that proceedings qua Amrapali Group are being looked at by the Supreme Court.

6.

Since more than one year has passed without definite information, we are inclined to close the instant appeals, with liberty to the appellant/revenue to approach the court for revival, albeit as per law, as and when they obtain clarity in the above-captioned matters.

7.

Consequently, the pending applications concerning condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal (i.e., CM APPL. 60497/2023 in ITA 646/2023) shall stand closed.

RAJIV SHAKDHER JUDGE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGE DECEMBER 21, 2023 MS