Anil Kumar And ORS v. State NCT Of Delhi And ANR.

$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4813/2024 ANIL KUMAR AND ORS .... Petitioners Through: Ms.Indu Bala, Advocate with petitioners in person versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Karambir Mr.Ajay Kr., Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 31.05.2024 CRL.M.A. 18001/2024 (exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

The application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 4813/2024 1.

By way of present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.371/2021 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at P.S. Aman Vihar, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

2.

The present FIR is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute between the complainant/respondent No. 2 (wife) and petitioner No.1 (husband) whereas petitioner Nos.2 to 3 are the in-laws of the complainant. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/06/2024 at 11:42:22

3.

Learned APP for the State submits that the petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No. 2 is the complainant/victim. He further submits that the chargesheet has been filed.

4.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their dispute on 19.08.2023 before Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi vide Settlement/Agreement. It is stated that petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 have already been granted divorce by mutual consent vide divorce decree dated 18.12.2023 passed by the Family Court, Rohini, Delhi in HMA No.3347/2023. It is further submitted that out of the settlement amount, the balance amount of Rs.1,00,000/- is being paid today through a demand draft bearing No.446206 dated 24.05.2024 drawn on Indian Bank. In terms of the settlement, respondent No. 2 is now left with no claim whatsoever against the petitioners.

5.

The affidavit has been placed on record to the extent that the rights of the minor child, who is in the custody of respondent No.2, shall remain unaffected by the terms of the settlement.

6.

The petitioners and respondent No.2, who are present in the Court, have been identified by their respective counsels and the Investigating Officer.

7.

Respondent No.2 states that she has entered into the aforesaid Settlement/Agreement out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed subject to encashment of the aforesaid demand draft.

8.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/06/2024 at 11:42:22

9.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

10.

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed subject to encashment of the aforesaid demand draft. 11.

The petition is disposed of in the above terms. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MAY 31, 2024 na The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/06/2024 at 11:42:23