Novo Nordisk As v. Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited & ANR.

$~19 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(COMM) 565/2025 NOVO NORDISK AS .....Plaintiff Through:

Mr. Rishabh Paliwal (VC), Mr. Sanchit Sharma, Advocates versus DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED & ANR.

.....Defendant Through:

Mr. Deepankar Mishra, Advocate

CORAM:

JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) Dr. AJAY GULATI

O R D E R

% 05.02.2026 IA No. 3221/2026 (u/Section 151 CPC r/w Rule 5, Chapter VII of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018 moved on behalf of the plaintiff seeking condonation of delay in filing replication).

1.

Issue notice. Notice accepted by ld. Counsel for the defendants who submits that if the delay is to be condoned, same should be subject to a reasonable cost.

2.

For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed subject to cost of Rs. 2500/-, to be paid to the defendants through its counsel within three weeks failing which further cost shall be imposed. Delay stands condoned. Replication to the written statement is taken on record. IA stands disposed off. Plaintiff is directed to re-file the replication within 5 days whereafter the Registry is directed to place the same on record. Dr. AJAY GULATI (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) FEBRUARY 5, 2026/sk The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 12:39:13