Udaipur Tollway Limited v. National Highways Authority Of India
$~10 to 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 437/2025 KISHANGARH GULABPURA TOLLWAY LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Anirudh Bakhru, Ms. Devika Mohan, Mr. Sarthak Sachdev and Mr. Pratyush Shrivastava, Advocates.
versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:
Mr. Gopal Singh, Advocate.
+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 438/2025 CG TOLLWAY LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Anirudh Bakhru, Ms. Devika Mohan, Mr. Sarthak Sachdev and Mr. Pratyush Shrivastava, Advocates.
versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:
Mr. Gopal Singh, Advocate.
+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 439/2025 UDAIPUR TOLLWAY LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Anirudh Bakhru, Ms. Devika Mohan, Mr. Sarthak Sachdev and Mr. Pratyush Shrivastava, Advocates.
versus O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 437/2025 & connected matters Page 1 of 3 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:
Mr. Gopal Singh, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
% 29.05.2025 I.A. 14027/2025 in O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 437/2025 I.A. 14064/2025 in O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 439/2025 1.
I.A. 14027/2025 has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking condonation of the delay of 58 days in re-filing the petition. 2.
I.A. 14064/2025 has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking condonation of the delay of 57 days in re-filing the petition. 3.
Issue notice.
4.
Mr. Gopal Singh, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of NHAI/Respondent.
5.
For the reasons stated in the applications, delay in re-filing the petitions is condoned and the applications are allowed and disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 437/2025 O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 438/2025 O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 439/2025 6.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 437/2025 is filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('1996 Act') seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal in Arbitration Case No. 3 between Kishangarh Gulabpura Tollway Ltd. and NHAI.
7.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 438/2025 is filed on behalf of the Petitioner O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 437/2025 & connected matters Page 2 of 3 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
under Section 29A(4) and (5) of the 1996 Act seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal in Arbitration Case No. 2 between CG Tollway Ltd. and NHAI.
8.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 439/2025 is filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 29A(4) and (5) of the 1996 Act seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal in Arbitration Case No. 1 between Udaipur Tollway Ltd. and NHAI.
9.
Issue notice.
10.
Mr. Gopal Singh, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of NHAI and on instructions submits that NHAI has no objection to the extension of mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal in all the three arbitration cases. 11.
It is stated in the petitions that the arbitral proceedings are at the stage of cross-examination of Claimant's witnesses and the mandate extended by this Court vide order dated 27.08.2024 has expired on 23.02.2025. 12.
Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of one year from 29.05.2025 and period between 24.02.2025 to 28.05.2025 is regularised and in respect of all the three arbitrations, being subject matter of these three petitions. 13.
Petitions are allowed and disposed of in the aforesaid terms. JYOTI SINGH, J MAY 29, 2025/shivam O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 437/2025 & connected matters Page 3 of 3 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.